the ring cork is 1" wide max, just the way I would spec it.
The block cork on my older 645 and newer 1652 (H-I era "Bronz-Glas" gold-painted blank) is about 0.1" larger diameter, but feels bulkier because of the less-tapered shape.
No rhyme or reason to when or where the differences turned up.
I would guess he used high-grade rings when he couldn't get block.
Also note, the quality of the block cork is lower than the rings - a lot more filler was needed.
All 3 of these rods are jewels and, other than cosmetic differences, the 1652 is delighted with a 6-wt, while the 645 and 652 are definite 7-wts.