It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 14:23


New Topic Add Reply
Author Message
Picked up a Fenwick FF85
Post 18 Sep 2018, 10:49 • #1 
Master Guide
Joined: 04/12/18
Posts: 457
I love the FF75 I bought here a short while ago and I later added an FF806 to the arsenal. I enjoy the feel of those rods.

This weekend, an elderly friend gifted me a like-new FF85 made in 1967. I've read about that one a little while back and remember it being described as "a cannon" and "stout as a mule". After a few minutes of yard casting, I'd have to agree! It is totally unlike my lighter Feralites but I love it.

I can hardly wait to bring this rod to Cape Cod for stripers this spring! It seems like it will be perfect for the job.

Tight lines,
Bob


Top
  
Quote
Post 18 Sep 2018, 12:13 • #2 
Master Guide
Joined: 07/11/14
Posts: 370
Location: US-NJ
The FF85 is a great fly rod.
Mine works well with the Barrio Mallard DT8F line.


Top
  
Quote
Post 18 Sep 2018, 18:06 • #3 
Master Guide
Joined: 08/12/07
Posts: 809
Location: US-TX
There are many who believe the FF85 was the best rod ever designed by Jimmy Green. Numerous distance casting records were set using this rod and,in it’s day, it was the steelhead rod all others were judged against. I still have 3 of them. Interestingly, Fenwick built a 3 piece version for a 6 weight line. They’re a little hard to come by but if you find one grab it. A very sweet 8 1/2 ft 6 wt.

https://vimeo.com/29972147

Link to old interview with Russell Chatham, author, artist, and well known steelhead/salmon fisherman from the 60’s. He is still a big fan of the FF85.


Top
  
Quote
Post 18 Sep 2018, 18:40 • #4 
Master Guide
Joined: 05/20/12
Posts: 984
Location: Eugene, OR
Thanks for posting that Russ Chatham interview; it never gets stale. He reminds me of one of the grumpy old men in the balcony on the Muppet Show, and that is just one of many reasons I admire him.
Image
Although I no longer own a heavier-weight FF85, I really enjoyed casting it with a DT7. It would huck a muddler minnow clear across the windy North Umpqua canyons with ease. Made me feel like a much better caster than I was.


Top
  
Quote
Post 19 Sep 2018, 13:00 • #5 
Glass Fanatic
Joined: 11/06/17
Posts: 2513
Location: South of Joplin
I like mine with a Triangle Taper, think it's marked 6-7, or with a DT8; I don't particularly like the way it roll casts with any line I've tried on it. It is light in the hand by comparison with my preferred roll casting rods.


Top
  
Quote
Post 19 Sep 2018, 19:39 • #6 
Master Guide
Joined: 04/12/18
Posts: 457
Thanks, Bud, for the interesting Chatham interview; I ended up watching the whole series. And thanks to everyone who shared their experiences with the rod and their line preferences.

When I'm going to do some test-casting in the yard, I string up my rod outside the garage doors, then walk into the back yard. As I'm walking, I false cast the few feet of fly line that's outside the tip to keep the leader from dragging on the driveway.

My very first impression of the FF85 was that it was heavy in the hand, but there was something interesting about the way that little bit of line was aggressively zipping back and forth... I was just casually waving the rod and it was driving tight loops in that short line, like it was chomping at the bit to cut loose with some long casts. Turns out it was! :-)

I'm going to try it out in the boat tomorrow, fishing for bass on a local lake. I have a feeling that I won't be too enamored with the weight of the rod. What I'm really looking forward to is trying it out on the striped bass on Cape Cod. On last year's trip, I caught a LOT of fish but the vast majority of them were larger schoolies. I would have loved to have put down the graphite nine-weight and fished a fiberglass eight. I'll have that option next spring.

Thanks again for all the input,
Bob


Top
  
Quote
Post 19 Sep 2018, 21:22 • #7 
Master Guide
Joined: 06/28/16
Posts: 930
Location: Northern WI
The 85's a hell of a rod. It can be a trout streamer rod, smallie rod, or even a steelhead stick. I liked it with a DT and WF 7 & 8.


Top
  
Quote
Post 20 Sep 2018, 16:52 • #8 
Guide
Joined: 05/17/13
Posts: 102
Location: On the Deschutes
Image

FF 85


Top
  
Quote
Post 20 Sep 2018, 18:14 • #9 
Glass Fanatic
Joined: 02/12/16
Posts: 4106
Location: USA-CO
A good acquisition, and catch!


Top
  
Quote
Post 20 Sep 2018, 19:54 • #10 
Master Guide
Joined: 04/12/18
Posts: 457
desmobob wrote:
I'm going to try it out in the boat tomorrow, fishing for bass on a local lake. I have a feeling that I won't be too enamored with the weight of the rod.


I spent the afternoon and evening out on the lake with the FF85 and was happy to find that the rod's weight was not an issue. I landed several nice largemouths, got bit off by two pike, and lost the largest fish of the day just as I was putting it on the reel. (The southern end of Lake Champlain is very muddy and I couldn't tell what I had on... I only knew it was a very large fish that needed to go on the reel. It spit the hook. It could have been a big channel cat, pike, bowfin, freshwater drum... I'll never know.)

I have a new favorite bass rod!

Tight lines,
Bob


Top
  
Quote
Post 24 Sep 2018, 16:52 • #11 
Glass Fanatic
Joined: 06/16/05
Posts: 2539
Location: Georgia
Nice. 1967 should be a serial no. G or H? Is it marked as for 7-8-9 lines, or 4 & 1/8 oz.? My E rod from a couple of years earlier is only marked 3 & 3/4 oz. but I think some other early version rods also showed as for 6 or 7 wt. lines and later ones showed the higher weight and lines. FWIW I like mine with a DT7.


Top
  
Quote
Post 24 Sep 2018, 17:31 • #12 
Master Guide
Joined: 04/12/18
Posts: 457
Upstreeam wrote:
Nice. 1967 should be a serial no. G or H? Is it marked as for 7-8-9 lines, or 4 & 1/8 oz.? My E rod from a couple of years earlier is only marked 3 & 3/4 oz. but I think some other early version rods also showed as for 6 or 7 wt. lines and later ones showed the higher weight and lines. FWIW I like mine with a DT7.

My rod is an "H" marked "7-8-9" and "4 1/8 oz." I haven't tried it with a 9wt line, but I have tried a WF7F and WF8F and prefer the 8wt line so far.

I think the rod is a lot of fun to fish. It almost feels like a graphite rod in the way it shoots line. With a fish on, it definitely feels like glass. The way it casts vs. the way it fights seems almost paradoxical to me. It's a favorite of mine, for sure... one of those rods that makes me smile.

If the lighter, 3 3/4oz 6-7 version performs similarly, I'll be on the lookout for one.

Tight lines,
Bob


Top
  
Quote
Post 25 Sep 2018, 01:37 • #13 
Glass Fanatic
Joined: 06/24/11
Posts: 1148
Location: Belgium
Don't overlook the 86 - it may just be the same as the 3 3/4oz. version of the 85 and yes, it does perform.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

New Topic Add Reply



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Google
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group